Report on New Patented Drugs - Trelstar
Under its transparency initiative, the PMPRB publishes the results of the reviews of new patented drugs by Board Staff, for purposes of applying the PMPRB's Excessive Price Guidelines (Guidelines) for all new active substances introduced after January 1, 2002.
Brand Name: Trelstar
Generic Name: (triptorelin pamoate)
DIN: 02240000 (3.75 mg/vial)
Patentee: Paladin Labs Inc.
Indication - as per product monograph:
For the management and relief of chronic pain associated with endometriosis.
For the palliative treatment of hormone dependent advanced carcinoma of the prostate cancer (Stage D2).
Date of Issuance of First Patent(s)
Pertaining to the Medicine: January 25, 1994
Notice of Compliance: July 06, 2005
Date of First Sale : August 15, 2006
ATC Class: L02AE04
Antineoplastic and Immunomodulating Agents; Endocrine Therapy; Hormones and Related Agents; Gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues.
APPLICATION OF THE GUIDELINES
The introductory price of Trelstar was found to be within the Guidelines because the cost of therapy did not exceed the cost of therapy of existing drugs in the therapeutic class comparison and did not exceed the range of prices of the same medicine in the comparator countries listed in the Patented Medicines Regulations, 1994 (Regulations) where Trelstar was sold.
Trelstar is a new active substance and the PMPRB's Human Drug Advisory Panel (HDAP) recommended that Trelstar be classified as a category 3 new medicine (provides moderate, little or no therapeutic over comparable medicines).
The Therapeutic Class Comparison (TCC) test of the Guidelines provides that the price of a category 3 new drug product cannot exceed the prices of other drugs that treat the same disease or condition. Comparators are generally selected from among existing drug products in the same 4th level of the World Health Organization (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) System that are clinically equivalent in addressing the approved indication. See the PMPRB's Compendium of Guidelines, Policies and Procedures for a more complete description of the Guidelines and the policies on TCCs.
The HDAP recommended Lupron Depot PFS (leuprolide acetate), Suprefact (buserelin acetate), and Zoladex (goserelin acetate) as comparator drug products to Trelstar. All these medications share the same 4th level ATC class, are indicated for the treatment of endometriosis and prostate cancer and are considered clinically equivalent for these indications.
Eligard (leuprolide acetate) was not recommended as a comparator to Trelstar as it is only indicated for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
The Guidelines provide that the dosage recommended for comparison purposes will normally not be higher than the maximum of the usual recommended dosage. The recommended comparable dosage regimens for Trelstar and the comparable drug products were based on the respective product monographs and supported by clinical literature.
Under the Guidelines, the introductory price of a new category 3 drug product will be presumed to be excessive if it exceeds the price of all of the comparable drug products based on theTCC test, or if it exceeds the prices of the same medicine in the seven countries listed in the Regulations.
The introductory price of Trelstar was within the Guidelines as the cost per treatment did not exceed the cost per treatment of the comparator medicines.
||Cost per Treatment
|Lupron Depot PFS
|Lupron Depot PFS
(1) Publicly available price as per the Regulations
(2)Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary, September 27, 2005.
In 2006, Trelstar was being sold in the seven countries listed in the Regulations. In compliance with the Guidelines, the price in Canada did not exceed the range of prices in those countries; the price in Canada was second highest, above the median international price.
Where comparators and dosage regimens are referred to in the Summary Reports, they have been selected by the HDAP for the purpose of carrying out the PMPRB's regulatory mandate, which is to review the prices of patented medicines sold in Canada to ensure that such prices are not excessive. The publication of these reports is also part of the PMPRB's commitment to make its price review process more transparent.
The information contained in the PMPRB's Summary Reports should not be relied upon for any purpose other than its stated purpose and is not to be interpreted as an endorsement, recommendation or approval of any drug nor is it intended to be relied upon as a substitute for seeking appropriate advice from a qualified health care practitioner.
References – Trelstar
1. AmericanCollege of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Medical management of endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2000;71:183-96.
2. Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2005;48:546-51.
3. BC Cancer Agency. Systemic management of prostate cancer. http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/HPI/CancerManagementGuidelines/
Cancer/MedicalCastration.htm (accessed November 20, 2006)
4. Bergqvist A, Bergh T, Hogström L, et al. Effects of triptorelin versus placebo on the symptoms of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1998;69:702-8.
5. Boccardo F, Decensi A, Guarneri D, et al. Long-term results with a long-acting formulation of D-TRP-6 LH-RH in patients with prostate cancer: an Italian prostatic cancer project (P.O.N.CA.P) study. Prostate 1987;11:243-55.
6. Boccardo F, Decensi A, Guarneri D, et al. Long-acting (Depot) D-TRP-6 LH-RH (Decapeptyl) in prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 1988;11(Suppl 2):S129-S131.
7. Botto H, Richard F, Mathieu F, et al. Decapeptyl in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: comparative study with pulpectomy. Prog Clin Biol Res 1989;303:53-60.
8. Canadian Cancer Society, Public Health Agency of Canada, and Statistics Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2005. http://www.ncic.cancer.ca/vgn/images/portal/cit_86751114/60/42/393678947
ncic_2005stats_en.pdf (accessed November 14, 2006).
9. Cancer CareOntario Genitourinary Disease Site Group. Maximal androgen blockade for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Practice guideline report # 3-1. February 5, 2003.
10. Cheung T, Lo K, Lam CW, et al. A crossover study of triptorelin and leuprorelin acetate, Fertil Steril 2000;74:299-305.
11. Child TJ, Tan SL. Endometriosis. Aetiology, pathogenesis and treatment. Drugs 2001;61:1735-50.
12. Choktanasiri W, Boonkasemsanti W, Sittisomwong T, et al. Long-acting triptorelin for the treatment of endometriosis.
Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996;54:237-43.
13. Cirkel U, Ochs H, Schneider HP. A randomized, comparative trial of triptorelin depot (D-Trp6-LHRH) and danazol in the treatment of endometriosis.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;59:61-9.
14. Davis CJ, McMillan L. Pain in endometriosis : effectiveness of medical and surgical management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:507-12.
15. De Sy WA, De Meyer JM, Casselman J, et al. A comparative study of a long acting luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist (decapeptyl) and orchiectomy in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer.
Acta Urol Belg 1986;54:221-9.
16. Dimopoulos MA, Kiamouris C, Gika D, et al. Combination of LHRH analog with somatostatin analog and dexamethasone versus chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomized phase II study. Urology 2004;63:120-5.
17. Donnez J, Dewart PJ, Hedon B, et al. Equivalence of the 3-month and 28-day formulations of triptorelin with regard to achievement and maintenance of medical castration in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2004;81:297-304.
18. ESMO Guideline Task Force. ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer.
Ann Oncol 2005;16 (suppl 1):i34-6.
19. Garcia-Velasco JA, Quea G. Medical treatment of endometriosis.
Minerva Ginecol 2005;57:249-55.
20. Gilliland GB. Endometriosis. In: Gray J, ed. Therapeutic Choices. 4th ed. Ottawa,ON: Canadian Pharmacists Association; 2003:763-73.
21. Giuliani L, Barreca T, Giberti C, et al. Treatment of prostatic cancer with a depot form of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue.
Eur Urol 1986;12:390-4.
22. Hedlund PO, Ala-Opas M, Brekkan E, et al. Parenteral estrogen versus combined androgen deprivation in the treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2002;36:405-13.
23. Hedlund PO, Henriksson P. Parenteral estrogen versus total androgen ablation in the treatment of advanced prostate carcinoma: effects on overall survival and cardiovascular mortality. Urology 2000;55:328-33.
24. Heyns CF, Simonin MP, Grosgurin P, et al. Comparative efficacy of triptorelin pamoate and leuprolide acetate in men with advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int 2003;92:226-31.
25. Jacobi GH, Wenderoth UK, Ehrenthal W, et al. Endocrine and clinical evaluation of 107 patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma under long-term pernasal buserelin or intramuscular Decapeptyl depot treatment.
Am J Clin Oncol 1988;11 (Suppl 1):S36-S43.
26. Kuhn JM, Abourachid H, Brucher P, et al. A randomized comparison of the clinical and hormonal effects of two GnRH agonists in patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol 1997;32:397-403.
27. Labrie F, Dupont A, Cusan L, et al. Combination therapy with flutamide and castration (LHRH agonist or orchiectomy) in previously untreated patients with clinical stage D2 prostate cancer: today's therapy of choice.
J Steroid Biochem 1988;30:107-117.
28. Labrie F, Dupont A, Cusan L, et al. Major advantages of “early” administration of endocrine combination therapy in advanced prostate cancer.
Clin Invest Med 1993;16:493-8.
29. Labrie F, Dupont A, Giguere M, et al. Advantages of the combination therapy in previously untreated and treated patients with advanced prostate cancer.
J Steroid Biochem 1986;25:877-83.
30. Loblaw DA, Mendelson DS, Talcott JA, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations for the initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer.
J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2927-41.
31. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate Cancer. V.2.2005.
32. Olive DL, Pritts EA. Treatment of endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2001;345:266-75.
33. Olive DL. Optimizing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy in women with endometriosis. Treat Endocrinol 2004;3:83-9.
34. Parmar H, Edwards L, Phillips RH, et al. Orchiectomy versus long-acting
D-Trp-6-LHRH in advanced prostatic cancer. Br J Urol 1987;59:248-54.
35. Parmar H, Lightman SL, Allen L, et al. Randomised controlled study of orchidectomy vs long-acting D-TRP-6-LHRH microcapsules in advanced prostatic carcinoma. Lancet 1985;2:1201-5.
36. Prentice A, Deary AJ, Goldbeck-Wood S, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 1999, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000346. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000346.pub2
37. Product Monograph of Anandron. CPS electronic version 2005.
38. Product Monograph of Androcur. CPS electronic version 2005.
39. Product Monograph of Casodex. CPS electronic version 2005.
40. Product Monograph of Cyclomen. CPS electronic version 2005.
41. Product Monograph of Eligard. CPS electronic version 2005.
42. Product Monograph of Euflex. CPS electronic version 2005.
43. Product Monograph of Lupron. CPS electronic version 2005.
44. Product Monograph of Lupron for endometriosis. CPS electronic version 2005.
45. Product Monograph of Megace. CPS electronic version 2005.
46. Product Monograph of Superfact and Superfact Depot. CPS electronic version 2005.
47. Product Monograph of Synarel. CPS electronic version 2005.
48. Product Monograph of Trelstar (triptorelin for injectable suspension).
Pharmacia Canada Inc. Mississauga,Ontario. May 30, 2002.
49. Product Monograph of Zoladex and Zoladex LA. CPS electronic version 2005.
50. Sciarra A, Di Silverio F. Effect of nonsteroidal antiandrogen monotherapy versus castration therapy on neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma. Urology 2004;63:523-7.
51. Tortorice PV. Prostate cancer. In: Schumock GT, Brundage DM, Richardson MM, et al, eds. Pharmacotherapy self-assessment program, 5th ed. Hematology and oncology. Kansas City,MO: American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 2006:123-44.
52. Wong AY, Tang L. An open and randomized study comparing the efficacy of standard danazol and modified triptorelin regimens for postoperative disease management of moderate to severe endometriosis.
Fertil Steril 2004;81:1522-7.
53. Wood L, Wilke D, Rendon R, et al. Guidelines for the management of prostate cancer. Genitourinary Cancer Site Team, Cancer CareNova Scotia, 2005.
54. Zorn JR, Tanger C, Roger M, et al. Therapeutic hypogonadism induced by a delayed-release preparation of microcapsules of D-Trp-6-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: a preliminary study in eight women with endometriosis. Int J Fertil 1986;31:11-27.
55. Zorn JR, Soubrane O, Siboni O, et al. Medical reversible castration with D-Trp-6-LH-RH microcapsules for the treatment of endometriosis.
Contr Gynecol Obstet 1987;16:254-59.
56. Zorn JR, Mathieson J, Risquez F, et al. Treatment of endometriosis with a delayed release preparation of the agonist D-Trp6-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: long-term follow-up in a series of 50 patients.
Fertil Steril 1990;53:401-6.