The PMPRB monitors the prices charged by patentees for patented drugs on an ongoing basis. Under the Patent Act, patentees are required to file price and sales information about their patented drug products at introduction and twice a year thereafter for each strength of each dosage form of each patented drug product sold in Canada. However, patentees are welcome to consult with the PMPRB on the application of the Guidelines at any time. The Board may, on request, pre-approve a price under certain conditions by issuing an Advance Ruling Certificate. Patentees are not required to obtain approval of the price before a drug is sold.
If you are a patentee, please visit Are You a Patentee? for more information about your reporting obligations.
The first step in the PMPRB´s regulatory process is a scientific review, which assesses the level of therapeutic improvement of a new patented drug product. A committee of experts known as the Human Drug Advisory Panel also recommends appropriate drug products to be used for comparison. The level of therapeutic improvement of a patented drug is used to determine a ceiling price, known as the Maximum Average Potential Price, at introduction.
Board Staff reviews pricing information for all patented drug products sold in Canada on an ongoing basis to ensure that the prices charged by patentees comply with the Guidelines established by the Board. The Guidelines, which are based on the price determination factors in Section 85 of the Act, were developed by the Board in consultation with stakeholders, including the provincial and territorial Ministers of Health, consumer groups, and the pharmaceutical industry.
New Patented Medicines Reported to the PMPRB
The PMPRB publishes information on the price review of all new patented drug products in a searchable table format. This format was introduced in January 2012 as part of the ongoing implementation of the 2010 Guidelines. The table is updated as the review of each new patented drug product is completed.
Each new patented drug product from 2010 onward that has a status classified as “Within the Guidelines” or “Does Not Trigger an Investigation” has a link from the brand name to an individual Price Review Record. Price Review Records include information such as the level of therapeutic improvement; the price test used to establish the maximum average potential price (MAPP); comparable drug products and countries used for price comparisons; and the MAPP.
Price Review Records are currently available for almost all new drug products reported in 2010 and will be gradually populated for 2011. Summary Reports are available for new drug products reported prior to 2010.
If Board Staff finds that a price appears to exceed the Guidelines, and the circumstances meet the criteria for commencing an investigation, Board Staff will open an investigation to determine whether the price of the patented drug product in fact exceeds the Guidelines.
An investigation could result in:
- closure of the file if the price is found to be within the Guidelines
- a Voluntary Compliance Undertaking by the patentee to reduce the price and offset excess revenues through a payment and/or a reduction in the price of another patented drug
- a public hearing to determine whether the price is excessive.
Voluntary Compliance Undertakings
A Voluntary Compliance Undertaking (VCU) is a written undertaking by a patentee to comply with the Board´s Guidelines, including lowering prices and offsetting excess revenues.
Patentees are given an opportunity to submit a VCU when Board Staff concludes, following an investigation, that the price of a patented drug product sold in Canada appears to have exceeded the Guidelines.
A VCU can also be submitted following the issuance of a Notice of Hearing but must be approved by the Hearing Panel.
If the price of a patented medicine appears to be excessive, the Board can hold a public hearing. If it finds that the price is excessive, it may issue an order to reduce the price and to offset revenues received as a result of the excessive price.
Board decisions are subject to judicial review in the Federal Court of Canada.